Legal Opinion
Veale v. CITIBANK, F.S.B.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 19, 1996No. 94-4463PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from the District Court’s judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs, Carl and Mary Veale, brought suit under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), alleging that Citibank did not provide the required material disclosures in connection with a home mortgage loan. Because Citibank did not violate TILA as a matter of law, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In July of 1989, the Veales borrowed $361,-800 from Citibank. The loan was secured by a first security interest in the Veale’s primary residence. The Veale’s used the money to pay off…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Wilda M. Thomas Elizabeth W. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Roboserve, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Tom's Foods, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Herby Berryhill and Lucille Berryhill v. Rich Plan of Pensacola, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of SunriseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Jones v. United Space Alliance, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- DeKalb County School District v. SchrenkoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.