Piaget Novelty Co. v. Headley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from a decree of the circuit court, Southern district of New York. 107 Fed. 134. The suit was brought for alleged infringement of two patents, and the court held claim 3 of the earlier one to be infringed, and claim 5 of the later one not to be infringed. Tire defendants only appeal. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The first patent is for a toy registering savings bank, and has for its object to provide a receptacle for money, which shall be secure against being opened except when a certain sum has been deposited therein, and which shall at all times visually indicate the exact sum or sums of money that have been deposited. The third claim reads:
“(o) Tlie combination with a money receptacle provided with an indicating (Uni or dials and inedianism. substantially as described, for indicating the (exact money value of deposited coins, of a door or locking mechanism and interlocking…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Harper Bros. v. KlawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Gridiron Steel Company, Claintiff-Appellant v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Gridiron Steel Company v. Jones & Laughlin Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Raymond Boyd v. Schildkraut Giftware Corporation and D & E Trading CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.