Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wark v. Freerksen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1987No. 85-0429C; CA A36518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*92ROSSMAN, J.

Defendant, a trial judge, appeals from a judgment of the circuit court ordering that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding him to dismiss a criminal prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants pending against relator. Relator petitioned for the writ after the judge granted the state’s motion for a mistrial at his trial and denied his subsequent motion to dismiss. The circuit court ordered the writ issued after concluding that further prosecution would violate relator’s statutory and constitutional rights against twice being placed in jeopardy for the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MilenkovichNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SalzmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Wark v. FreerksenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API