Legal Opinion

State v. Salzmann

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1993No. C9111-36157; CA A75561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

We dismissed defendant’s appeal in an order of dismissal. ORAP 7.15(1). Defendant filed a petition for review, which we treat as one for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15(1). We allow reconsideration, modify our previous order and adhere to it as modified.1 The issue is whether defendant has a right to a direct interlocutory appeal when a trial court denies a motion to dismiss on the ground of former jeopardy.2 We conclude that he does not and allow the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Defendant is charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery. His defense is mistaken identity. During trial, he…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TorresMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RearickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. People v. TorresMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Salzmann v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API