Legal Opinion
Haight v. THE WACKENHUT CORP.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2010No. 03 Civ. 9870(SCR)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEPHEN C. ROBINSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Scott Haight and seventy-four other security officers who have opted into this litigation, have brought this case against the Defendant, the Wackenhut Corporation, for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendant failed to compensate its security officers for time spent performing certain activities preliminary and postliminary to scheduled working time. Defendant has made a motion for partial summary judgment against Plaintiffs, asserting that the Second Circuit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bamonte v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Baldwin v. TMPL Lexington LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Bamonte v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.