Legal Opinion
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Saxony Carpet Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 13, 1995No. 94 Civ. 0283 (DAB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATTS, District Judge.
Defendants move, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. Plaintiffs move, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied, and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1986, Defendant Saxony Carpet Company, Inc. (“Saxony”) and Elite Carpets Ltd. (“Elite”) began a business relationship that lasted until 1988, when Elite ceased operation of its business. (Pl.’s Local Rule 3(g)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bridgeway Corp. v. CitibankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- CIBC Mellon Trust Co. v. Mora Hotel Corp. N.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Evans Cabinet Corp. v. Kitchen International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- S.C. Chimexim S.A. v. Velco Enterprises Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.