Legal Opinion

La Eace v. Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 30, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

The sole question presented is whether a wife may recover for loss of consortium due to an injury negligently inflicted on her husband.

Appellant’s husband, George LaEace, sustained personal injuries while a passenger on a bus operated by appellee. Appellant seeks $5,000 damages for loss of consortium, alleging the injuries suffered by her husband resulted from appellee’s negligence and were the proximate cause of her loss of that consortium. Appellee’s general! demurrer to the petition was sustained. Having declined to plead further, appellant’s petition was dismissed.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Cravens v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Nash v. Mobile O.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mo. Pac. Trans. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API