Legal Opinion

Cravens v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 28, 1922PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Nelson Circuit Court. Appeal from Bullitt Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming in Cravens v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., and reversing in Hoagiand v. Louisville & Nashville. Railroad Co., both on the original and cross appeal.

These two appeals involve similar questions, were argued together and will be considered in one opinion.

The first mentioned appeal grows out of a suit brought by T.W. Cravens on January 17,1919, against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to recover damages for the loss of the services of his wife, Eliza M. Cravens, who was severely injured in a collision that occurred at Shepherdsville on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew. Agnew v. Werthan Bag CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  4. Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Deshotel v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API