Legal Opinion

Claycomb v. Didawick

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1998No. Record 972102PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in striking the plaintiff’s evidence and entering summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the ground that the evidence showed, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent because he failed to keep a proper lookout.

Background

“When summary judgment is based upon the granting of a motion to strike a party’s evidence, we view the evidence and the inferences reasonably raised thereby in the light most favorable to the party whose evidence has been stricken.” Griffin v. The Spacemaker Group, Inc., 254 Va. 141,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Austin v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Costner v. LackeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Franconia Associates v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  4. Karim v. GroverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Warehouse Distributors, Inc. v. Prudential Storage & Van Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Downtown Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Bitar v. RahmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Halterman v. Radisson Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Bratton v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2015
  5. Polyzos v. CotrupiSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API