Legal Opinion

Polyzos v. Cotrupi

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 7, 2002No. Record 011778PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz

In this appeal, we consider whether expert testimony was necessary to prove claims of negligence and breach of contract against a real estate agent when a contract for the sale of real estate required conveyance of a parcel larger than that which the owners retained the real estate agent to sell.

BACKGROUND

George K. Polyzos and Jennifer P. Polyzos (the Polyzoses) engaged Frank Cotrupi, a licensed real estate agent, to list, market, and sell a portion of a parcel of residential real estate they owned on the waterfront of the Warwick River in Newport News commonly known as 1109 Patrick Lane.

The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. FatehiSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Raines v. LutzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Austin v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  4. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. LipscombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Lambert v. Downtown Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monica v. Elaine Day HottelLoudoun County Circuit Court · 2004
  2. Foster v. Wintergreen Real Estate Co.Nelson County Circuit Court · 2010
  3. Prudential Residential Services v. Tony Conway CashAmherst County Circuit Court · 2005
  4. Sloan Ex Rel. Juergens v. Urban Title Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Norton v. Wilkins & Co. Realty, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API