Legal Opinion

Reed & Martin, Inc. v. City & County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1968No. 4611PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ABE, J.

This suit was filed by Reed 8c Martin, Inc., (hereinafter called “Contractor”) against the City and County of Honolulu (hereinafter called “City”) for additional payment of $29,570.24 for 3,495.3 cubic yards of unclassified excavation under a public construction contract.

The sole issue is whether the excavation in question should be paid under item No. 3 or item No. B-l of the bid schedule, to wit:

Item Work or Estimated Unit No. Material Quantity Unit Price Amount

* # *

3. Excavation 33,367 Cu. Yd. $ 2.44 $81,415.48 Unclassified

IP TP

B-l Unclassified struc- 5,600…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Quillin v. PeloquinOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cordes v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Citizens Utilities Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. MacKenzie v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hanagami v. China Airlines, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bishop Trust Co., Ltd. v. Central Union ChurchHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Foundation International, Inc. v. E.T. Ige Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API