Legal Opinion
Konon v. Fornal
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 17, 1985No. Civ. H-84-739PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which the plaintiff claims that three East Hartford police officers physically abused him and later preferred false criminal charges against him. The complaint alleges, inter alia, claims of malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and the use of excessive force by the defendants. The defendants have moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff’s claims of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment are barred as a matter of law.
A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Pouncey v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- Clewley v. Brown Thomson, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Dwayne Taylor and Charles D. Dixon v. Greg Gregg and City of Lubbock, Texas, MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Robert F. Davis v. James Grusemeyer, Raymond Gurak, Donald Yingling, David v. Brody, and Charles E. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Roesch v. OtarolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.