Legal Opinion

Roesch v. Otarola

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 27, 1992No. 74, Docket 92-7281PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

In Singleton v. City of New York, 632 F.2d 185 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 920, 101 S.Ct. 1368, 67 L.Ed.2d 347 (1981), we held that a defendant granted an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal under New York law could not maintain a section 1983 action sounding in malicious prosecution. This appeal primarily raises the issues whether Singleton applies to bar (i) a section 1983 malicious prosecution claim by a plaintiff whose criminal case was terminated pursuant to Connecticut’s accelerated pretrial rehabilitation program, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 54-56e…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Malinski v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Morrison v. LefevreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Gilles v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Douglas McClish v. Richard B. NugentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Washington v. County Of RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API