Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Miller & Lux

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1909No. S.F. No. 5201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the transfer of stock in a corporation. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is a petition by certain persons claiming to be stockholders of a corporation known by the name of “Miller & Lux,” organized under the laws of California, against the said corporation' and its alleged directors to obtain a writ of mandate from this court directing the corporation to reissue to the petitioners a certificate of stock of said corporation. The parties are the same as those mentioned in the case of Lewis v. Curry, S. F. No. 5200, ante, p. 93, [103 Pac. 493], in which the opinion is this day filed. The stock was originally issued by said corporation in the name of one George…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Newlove v. Mercantile Tr. Co. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In re Double Star Brick Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1913
  5. Carpenter v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API