Legal Opinion
Middletown Iron & Steel Co. v. Evatt
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1941No. 28652 and 28653PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The sole question is whether the appellant taxpayer, in processing scrap metal according to specifications so that the product would be usable in open-hearth furnaces for the production of steel, was a manufacturer. If so, the metal in process will be assessed at fifty per cent. of its true value in money; if not, at seventy per cent.
Section 5385, General Code, reads:
"A person who purchases, receives or holds personal property, of any description, for the purpose of adding to the value thereof by manufacturing, refining, rectifying, or by the combination of different materials with a view of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schumacher Stone Co. v. Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rockcastle County v. W. J. Sparks Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- David J. Joseph Company v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- MacKe Co. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- H. Samuels Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Stoneco, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.