Legal Opinion
People v. Harris
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1979PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*212OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
This case involves the unusual twist that by coincidence one of the police officers involved was the son of the victim of the robbery and mother and son have testified somewhat differently concerning identification of defendant Harris.
Having pleaded guilty to second degree robbery, Harris appealed asserting as grounds for reversal: (1) that the court should have ruled out any in-court identification of defendant by the victim, because the identification procedures were suggestive and because the victim was influenced by conversations with her son; (2) that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. PaulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BleylSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. ColesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.