Legal Opinion

Judd v. City of St. Cloud

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1936No. 30,789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Upon plaintiffs' petition we have had a reargument.

The bases for recovery are stated. They are as follows:(1) "Plaintiffs are entitled to recover on the warrants, that is, in accordance with the City's expressed promise to repay the money borrowed from plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest."(2) "If plaintiffs are not entitled to recover on their first theory, they are entitled to judgment against the defendant for its breaches of those duties which are necessarily implied from the basis on which appellants' first theory is denied."

5. Discussing these in their order plaintiffs say:

"The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Vallelly v. Board of Park CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bolton v. Wharton, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Van Pelt v. BertilrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Bankers Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of AnamooseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Judd v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API