Legal Opinion
People v. Fino
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1964PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
Defendants were convicted of the crime of bookmaking (Penal Law, § 986) on the basis of evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Prior to the trial, defendants moved to suppress the evidence so seized on the ground that the search warrant was issued without a sufficient showing of probable cause. The motion was denied.
The affidavit of a member of the New York State police, which accompanied the application made to a Judge of the Erie County Court for the afore-mentioned search warrant, stated in pertinent part:
“ That your deponent has been conducting an investigation relative to gambling…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- United States v. Rene RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Will Parks Clay and Mattie Bell Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964
- Town of Speedway v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. DeNegris v. MenserDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.