Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Dorrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7548PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Newcomb, C.

— This was, originally, an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate, given by the appellants to one Daniel Dorrell, who assigned the same, with the mortgage *466notes, to the appellee. The notes were eleven in number, running from one to eleven years, and but one of them was due. They were given for the purchase-money of the land mortgaged. At the time of the sale and conveyance of the land to' Milton Hannah, there were two mortgages upon it, one to the State of Indiana, for the benefit of the school fund, which figures in the subsequent proceedings as “the school fund mortgage.”…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. RoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Schoonover v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Makepeace v. LukensIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Reily v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Uland v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harris v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gardner v. NewbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. On the Relation of Rosenbarger v. MAR. CCIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Scheiring v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Morgan v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API