Legal Opinion

On the Relation of Rosenbarger v. MAR. CC

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1958No. 29,720PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAchor, J.

This is an action for writ of mandate. The facts in the case are as follows:

Relator, the father of a child, filed an action for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the respondent court, claiming that Carl L. Spencer and Pearl Spencer, maternal grandparents of said minor child, unlawfully detained the custody of his child. A judgment unappealed from was rendered on February 26, 1953. The judgment granted custody of the child to the Spencers, but made the child a ward of the court, all “subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this court.”

On January 2, 1958 relator filed his petition in the same action,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Scott v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Manners v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hannah v. DorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Scheiring v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Haag v. HaagIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Clouser v. MockIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Morgan Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Kelley v. Marion County Criminal CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API