Legal Opinion

Struble v. Hake

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snydeb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Wall, P. -J.

This was an action of assumpsit by Hake against Struble and Frederick to recover two installments of rent due upon a lease. Service was had upon Struble alone, and the case proceeded without further notice of Frederick, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $1,675.05 and costs. The defendant Struble plead non assumpsit, and the case was tried by the court without a jury, by consent. It appears from the evidence that the lease mentioned in the declaration was duly executed by theplaintiff to Struble and Frederick, covering certain premises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eddy v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Borchsenius v. CanutsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bristow v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Wilson v. BevansIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Walden v. KarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gorin v. WileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API