Legal Opinion

Timmons v. City of Morrilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1957No. 5-1158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal by E. H. Timmons against three parties, being (1) Clyde Wallace; (2) George Brannan; and (3) the City of Morrilton. For each identification we will refer to the parties by name; and we will discuss separately the appeal of Timmons against each such party.

I. The Appeal Of Timmons Against Wallace. On October 19, 1955, Timmons filed a complaint in the Chancery Court against Clyde Wallace. Subsequently there were a number of amendments to the complaint, so that finally the allegations were: that on February 28, 1948, Clyde Wallace, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. RowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Timmons v. BrannanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Gibbons v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Van Bibber v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Timmons v. BrannanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riddle v. UdoujSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API