Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Brannan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 20, 1955No. 5-707PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is the second suit to reach this Court between the same parties, who are adjoining property owners. The other case is Timmons v. Brannan, 219 Ark. 636, 244 S. W. 2d 136; and is hereinafter referred to as “the first case.”

In the first ease we sustained a contract between the parties which established the entire West boundary line of Timmons’ property and the entire East boundary line of Brannan’s property. The written contract between the parties, dated May 20,1950, was copied in full in our opinion in the first case. For convenient reference we recopy two of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Meyer v. EichenbaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Andrews v. Gross Janes Tie CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Seaboard Finance Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Shorten v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wells v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Charles R. Howard v. Katherine GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Hastings v. Rose CourtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Olmstead v. Rosedale Building & SupplySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Shermer v. HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API