Arrowsmith v. Durell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from tlie Fourth District Court of New Orleans. Theard, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
The only question presented for our decision is, whether or not a devolutive appeal suspends or interrupts the prescription of a judgment under the act of 1853, p. 250.
By the letter of the statute, the question must ho answered in the negative. It provides that: “Hereafter all judgments for money, whether rendered within'or without the State, shall ho prescribed by the lapse of ten years from tho rendition of said judgment; provided, however, that any party interested in any judgment may have tho same revived at any time before it is prescribed by having a citation issued according to law to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Bailey v. Louisiana N.W.R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Viator v. HeintzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Hava v. CafieroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Amy v. City of Watertown.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1884
- Gooden v. Police Jury of Lincoln ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.