Legal Opinion

Amy v. City of Watertown.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin

Decided August 26, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This is an action brought upon three several bonds and interest coupons issued by the city of Watertown, June 1, 1856, to *419the Milwaukee & Madison Railroad Company. The bonds became due January 1, 3 877, and the summons was issued on June 19, 1883. To avoid the plea of the statute of limitations, which would otherwise appear on the face of the complaint to have run upon the bonds and coupons, the plaintiff sots out at considerable length facts which it will not be necessary to recite hero in detail, but which are intended to show that the plaintiffs have been prevented from bringing their…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  3. M'iver, Lessees v. RaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Gaines v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Demarest v. WynkoopNew York Court of Chancery · 1817

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pugnier v. RamharterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lawson v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Minster Loan & Savings Co. v. LaufersweilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Zahn v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ardrey v. ShellOhio Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API