Legal Opinion
Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. Sulyma
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 2020No. 18-1116PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
*773 The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires plaintiffs with "actual knowledge" of an alleged fiduciary breach to file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge rather than within the 6-year period that would otherwise apply. § 413(a)(2)(A), 88 Stat. 889 , as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1113 . The question here is whether a plaintiff necessarily has "actual knowledge" of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading. We hold that he does not and therefore affirm.
I
A
Retirement plans governed by ERISA must have at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Mary Chambers v. DC (EN BANC)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Allegheny Defense Project v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Ann Dormani v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Charles Guenther v. Lockheed Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Stefan Ingram v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.