Legal Opinion

Wallack Construction Co. v. Smalwich Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the erection of a structure in violation of a set-back agreement.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendants, the owner and tenant, respectively, of the premises immediately adjoining its premises to the east thereof on the north side of West Thirtieth street, between Fifth avenue and Broadway, in the borough of Manhattan, New York city, from erecting thereon, in alleged violation of an eight-foot set-back agreement, any building or structure whatever so as to occupy any part of such space. The plaintiff’s property is improved with a large modern twelve-story loft building, set back eight feet from the street line, while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Batchelor v. . HinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Zipp v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Adams v. HowellNew York Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallack Construction Co. v. Smalwich Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API