Legal Opinion

McCain Realty Co. v. Aylesworth

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Larkin, J.

A person owning a tract of land and selling a portion thereof may for the benefit of his remaining land and also for the benefit of his grantees impose any restrictions, not against public policy, he sees fit upon the land granted and a court of equity will as a general rule enforce them. (Rowland v. Miller, 139 N. Y. 93, 102; Korn v. Campbell, 192 id. 490, 495; Booth v. Knipe, 225 id. 390, 396; Moore v. Henderson, 99 Misc. 344, 351; affd., 181 App. Div. 942; Bouvier v. Segardi, 112 Misc. 689.)

The covenant is enforcible by the grantor or his assigns in favor of the property benefited and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Sanborn v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Zipp v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Zipp v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Levy v. SchreyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neilson v. Hiral Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API