Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1953No. Civ. 4716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On May 26, 1947, the defendant leased 71 acres of land in the “Pauma Rancho” to the plaintiffs for two years, with an option to buy. The agreement provided for a rental of $15,000 payable in advance and $15,000 payable on December 1,1948, with an option to purchase the property prior to May 31, 1949, by paying an additional $5,000 and giving a note and trust deed for $35,000. It was agreed that the plaintiffs should pay all water bills and “all water assessments levied; during the term of the lease; that the plaintiffs should have the right to vote the defendant’s water stock in the Pauma…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Schied v. Bodinson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API