Legal Opinion

Baker v. Dahlman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. 26990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

The instant case involves the resurfacing of a number of contiguous and intersecting streets in Omaha, quite a large-district in the residence portion of the city. The city council proceeded under section 3571, Comp. St. 1922, which provides for the surfacing of a street or part of a street without obtaining a petition from the adjoining property owners, and charged the cost to the abutting property. The-plaintiffs (appellees here) brought suit to enjoin the collection of the special -assessments and to cancel the same. Upon trial the district court entered a decree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hutchinson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Futscher v. City of RuloNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Brown Real Estate Co. v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cullingham v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shanahan v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API