Legal Opinion
Rutland v. Rutland
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 2013No. 13-CA-70PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge.
| ¡Appellant, Heidi Rutland, seeks review of the trial court’s judgment establishing a final child support award. For the following reasons, we affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND EVIDENCE
Ms. Rutland and Mr. Rutland were married on June 1, 2002. One child was born of their marriage on August 12, 2003. The parties separated on March 10, 2010. Ms. Rutland filed a petition for divorce on February 7, 2011, and requested custody of her minor son, subject to supervised visitation and child support. A hearing on the ancillary matters was initially scheduled for March 14, 2011,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hall v. Excelsior Steam Laundry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dufresne v. DufresneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Vaccari v. VaccariSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McClanahan v. McClanahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Dazet v. PriceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Lavigne v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015