Legal Opinion
Cannata v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
In a case of first impression in New York State, brought by the plaintiffs for a judgment (a) declaring section 72-n of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York (added by L. 1958, ch. 924) as unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to the project area herein involved; (b) declaring null and void, and canceling the designation of the area as blighted; and (c) restraining the City of New York from proceeding further in connection with its project affecting said area, the defendant City of New York, hereinafter referred to as “City ”, moves under subdivision 4 of rule 106 and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klibanoff v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Cannata v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Paterno v. Washington Square Village Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961