Legal Opinion

Paterno v. Washington Square Village Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

William C. Hecht, Jr., J.

Defendant Grand Union Company moves for dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency. Each of the plaintiffs states a separate cause of action based upon the same transactions. Each plaintiff was a residential tenant at premises 134 Bleecker Street in New York City. On that site there now stands a single-story building occupied by the moving defendant. The site was part of a larger area condemned by the city and resold to sponsors in connection with- the Redevelopment Plan Under Title I of the Federal Housing Act of 1949 (63 U. S. Stat. 413, 414). The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cannata v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Klibanoff v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API