Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Westlecraft

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On rule to show cause why verdict directed for plaintiff should not be set aside.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

In a previous suit brought by the present plaintiff against the defendant and his now deceased partner, constituting the firm of J. Westleeraft & Son, there was a submission to arbitration executed by the plaintiff and the present defendant purporting to bind his firm, and the submission was made a rule of court, pursuant to the statute. Comp. Stat., p. 103, § 1. The award, when made, was filed in the suit, and plaintiff moved for final judgment thereon, but his motion was denied on the ground that proper practice did not authorize such a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karthaus v. Yllas Y FerrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Duckworth v. DigglesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Tillinghast v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferreri v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Rosa v. Transport Operators Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API