Legal Opinion

Willard v. Hodapp

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1906No. Nos. 14,803-(98)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Lorin Cray, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Blue Earth denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in an action to determine adverse claims to certain lots in the city of Mankato.

*270The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was the owner in fee of the-lots; that they were vacant and unoccupied and that the defendants-without right claimed an interest therein adverse to the plaintiff. The-prayer of the complaint was for judgment that the plaintiff was the owner of the lots and that the defendants and each of them have no-estate in or lien thereon. The defendant John…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. M'Kee, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1791
  2. St. Paul Division No. 1 v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  3. Kipp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Feller v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shine v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Chas. W. Eddy & Co. v. HinchmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Pieper v. MacLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API