Kipp v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of tbe district court for Chi-■sago county, where the action was tried by Crosby, J., without a jury. cited Bower v. O’Donnall, 29 Minn. 135.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Action to determine adverse claim to vacant and 'unoccupied land, brought under Gen. St. 1878, c. 75, § 2. The defendant, in his answer, claimed title under a tax deed executed by the county auditor on the 15th day of July, 1869, purporting to be made pursuant to the provisions of Gen. St. (1866,) c. 11, §§ 137, *361156, 157, as of land forfeited to the state at the tax sale of June, 1865. Defendant having introduced this deed in evidence, “the plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove facts that would invalidate the tax deed, to which defendant objected, on the ground that he was precluded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- St. Paul Division No. 1 v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- New York & Minnesota Gold Mining Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Cullen v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Donaldson v. Chase Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.