Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bitner v. Bitner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1950No. 28,641Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION I concur in that part of the opinion allowing support for the two children in the custody of appellee. But there should be no doubt cast upon the duty of the court to make such allowance, even though the evidence should indicate that the wife and her relatives are able to support them. The duty of a father to support his children has been well expressed by Bridwell, J., inDenning v. Star Publishing Co. (1932), 94 Ind. App. 300, 307,180 N.E. 685, 687, thus:

"The duty of a father to provide for the maintenance of his minor children is a principle of natural law. The obligation…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Eastes v. EastesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Davis v. BabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API