Legal Opinion

Cootz v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 18118PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a prisoner’s rights case. In reaching our decision we must first determine whether the scope of the due process clause of our state constitution is the same as that of the due process clause of the federal constitution. We hold that our due process clause does not necessarily have the same scope as that of the federal constitution. In this case we conclude that the burden of proof established by the United States Supreme Court in prison discipline cases is the standard we establish under our due process clause. However, we hold that there were inadequate written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. White v. Idaho Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RadfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CoassoloIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schevers v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Maresh v. State, Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. CaballeroIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sheehan v. Morris Irrigation, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API