Legal Opinion
Schevers v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1996No. 22684PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
Appellant James A Schevers (Schevers) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated during a prison disciplinary proceeding, as were his due process rights under Art. I, Section 13 of the Idaho Constitution. The magistrate court dismissed the petition based on Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). The district court affirmed and Schevers appeals.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Schevers is incarcerated in the South Idaho Correctional Institution (SICI). In December 1994,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RadfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CoassoloIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.