Legal Opinion

Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 24, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 The issue presented is whether funds paid to settle a product liability action are reimbursable costs under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-684(A) (2003). 1 For the following reasons, we conclude the term “costs” has an established meaning under the law that does not include settlement payments.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The present action stems from a fire that occurred at an asphalt plant owned by Vulcan Materials Company (“Vulcan”). The fire originated in a booster heater, which contained an oil burner manufactured by Beckett and sold to Vulcan by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API