Heatec, Inc. v. R.W. Beckett Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
¶ 1 The issue presented is whether funds paid to settle a product liability action are reimbursable costs under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-684(A) (2003). 1 For the following reasons, we conclude the term “costs” has an established meaning under the law that does not include settlement payments.
BACKGROUND
¶2 The present action stems from a fire that occurred at an asphalt plant owned by Vulcan Materials Company (“Vulcan”). The fire originated in a booster heater, which contained an oil burner manufactured by Beckett and sold to Vulcan by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015