Legal Opinion

People v. Laurence

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 16, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*613OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael C. Curci, J.

Upon the notice of motion and affidavits annexed, this motion is decided as follows.

Defendants joined together to move for a hearing suppressing physical evidence obtained by an unlawful search and seizure pursuant to CPL 710.30, contending substantially that one John Smoot is a special patrolman, and he not having probable cause to arrest the two defendants, the evidence should be suppressed.

The defense spends three pages at their affirmation predicating the thrust of their position upon the assumption that John Smoot is a "special patrolman.” The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. HormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. People v. FrankNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. SmithCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  4. People v. BowersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
  5. Velez v. SugarmanNew York Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LucianiNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. GlennCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
  3. People v. SeamanNew York District Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API