Legal Opinion

People v. Frank

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1966PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward R. Dudley, J.

Application for a preliminary hearing ■seeking the suppression of certain statements as being involuntarily obtained (Code Grim. Pro., §§ 813-f, 813-g, 813-h).

Under the circumstances of this case, counsel for both sides have stipulated that the court shall decide a threshold question: Is defendant herein entitled to a hearing, as a matter of law, under the decision of People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) to contest the voluntariness of certain statements reputedly made by her, and even if the statements were not coerced is she entitled also to a hearing pursuant to the rules as found in Miranda…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BoweHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. People v. HaydelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Schaumberg v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. United States v. Nicholas P. AntonelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API