Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 24, 2008No. 2007AP1114-CR, 2007AP1115-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. This is a sentence credit case. At issue is whether the "in connection with" requirement in the sentence credit statute, Wis. Stat. § 973.155(l)(a) (2005-06),1 applies individually to each concurrent sentence imposed at the same time. Johnson argues that, under State v. Ward, 153 Wis. 2d 743, 452 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1989), when concurrent sentences are imposed at the same time, credit due against any individual sentence must be awarded against all concurrent sentences. We disagree. We conclude that the "in connection with" requirement applies to each sentence individually, even when…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. LOCAL 248 UAW v. NatzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BeiersdorfCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. CarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API