Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Carter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2010No. 2006AP1811-CRPublished

1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 108. (dissenting). The facts often determine the law. My first purpose in this dissent is to set out the facts as clearly and completely as an inadequate record permits. My second purpose is to apply the law to these facts.

I

¶ 109. On December 13, 2003, the defendant, Patrick C. Carter, was arrested in Chicago. He was taken into custody on a probation violation arrest warrant that was issued by a Cook County judge on September 3, 2002. He also was arrested on a July 23, 2003, felony warrant issued in Wisconsin.

¶ 110. These grounds for arrest will be discussed in turn.

¶ 111. Patrick Carter…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kronz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Klimas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Ernest C. Davis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API