Legal Opinion
Rash v. Pratt
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided April 26, 1920No. Trespass, No. 36PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPennewill, C. J.
We will admit this testimony, subject to a motion to strike out".
Q. Did Mrs. Rash make any declarations to you in the year 1912 in relation to her husband’s treatment of her, and her feelings toward him?
A. Not in 1912, she didn’t.
Q. In what year did she make them?
A. 1913.
Q. What, if anything, did Mrs. Rash say to you on the occasion that you have just referred to in relation to her feelings toward her husband?
A. She told me she couldn’t love him. She said he didn’t use her right. He drank, and was abusive; • and he was too hard of hearing. Any time she spoke to him about it he was insanely…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prettyman v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
- Lupton v. UnderwoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LongDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1923
- Rush v. BucklesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hirschy v. CoodleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Fox v. FuchsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
- Wiener v. MarkelSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.