Legal Opinion

Rush v. Buckles

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

The circuit court set aside a verdict in favor of defendant below, plaintiff in error, and awarded a new trial; and from that order this writ of error is prosecuted.

The declaration is in trespass and is by J. P. Rush against J. W. Buckles for damages in the sum of $20,000 for alienation, of, as the brief says, for partial alienation, of the affections of his wife Ellen Rush.

The errors assigned are: (1) refusal of the court to quash the affidavit for an attachment levied on defendant’s property; (2) setting aside the verdict in defendant’s favor and awarding a new trial.

To meet…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Martin v. ThayerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fratini v. CasliniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  4. Boland v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Gilmer v. SydenstrickerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Reese v. LowryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stone v. MatthiesIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Moore v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Morris v. NelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API