Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 11, 2013No. 2012-3037PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Darrel T. Crawford appeals from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) dismissing as moot his allegation that the Department of the Army (“the Agency”) failed to comply with an order for corrective action. The Board determined that the position to which Mr. Crawford was assigned by the Agency in response to the corrective action complied with § 4313(a)(2) of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”) because it was of “like status” to the position he held prior to his active, uniformed service. We do not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Serricchio v. WACHOVIA SECURITIES LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Stanley B. Parker v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Tom Briggs v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Henry P. Nichols v. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thomas Harwood, III v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Bryant v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- King v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Brenner v. DVACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.