Legal Opinion

Perry v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 20, 1948No. 28094-GPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for change of the venue of this cause from this district to the Southern District of California, Central Division, “for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a).

The action is one under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, commenced in this district pursuant to the authority of 45 U. S.C.A. § 56. The venue is properly here under § 56.

The motion is supported by an affidavit of defendant’s General Claim Agent (an alleged necessary witness), a resident of Los Angeles, in the Division and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayes v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Jenkins v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Dolly Toy Co. v. Bancroft-Rellim Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  5. McCarley v. Foster-Milburn Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API