Legal Opinion

State v. Parliament

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2000No. 970923C; CA A98046PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of two counts of cutting special forest products without a permit, ORS 164.813, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the charges based on its implicit finding that the state was not ready to proceed to trial. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

This case originally was appealed in conjunction with three other cases that were dismissed by the trial court at the same time and on the same grounds. Although the other cases have been disposed of separately, we must recount the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. GunderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. HilligossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. SondennaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. SandbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API