Legal Opinion

State v. Gunder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1998No. 96-7090; CA A95587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

The state appeals the trial court’s pretrial order dismissing with prejudice a charge of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). The dismissal was entered after the court denied the state’s motion for a postponement of trial because of the unavailability of an essential witness. We conclude that we have jurisdiction, State v. Freeman, 127 Or App 640, 873 P2d 1107 (1994), and that the court abused its discretion in entering the dismissal with prejudice. State v. Daniel, 98 Or App 695, 697-98, 780 P2d 784, rev den 308 Or 660 (1989). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

Defendant was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CarrilloOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. CheshierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. ParliamentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. HilligossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API